Springfield Loses Out In Foreclosure Ordinance Case

Gemma Ypparila – In December, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled Springfield’s 2011 foreclosure ordinances illegal because they are pre-empted by state law.  Six western Massachusetts banks challenged ordinances that attempted to address the wave of foreclosures and resulting public safety concerns triggered by the economic downturn of 2008.  The city sought to address urban blight by establishing a program requiring mandatory mediation between mortgagors and mortgagees as well as requiring owners of buildings that are vacant or undergoing foreclosure to register with the city so that the city could monitor and hold mortgagors and mortgagees alike liable for the upkeep and  maintenance of the foreclosed properties.  Ultimately, the court ruled that the only way these measures could be properly addressed would be through legislative change.  The case Easthampton Savings Bank & others v. City of Springfield, SJC-11612, 470 Mass. 284 (Dec. 19, 2014) can be found here. See a more detailed summary here.

Gemma Ypparila focuses her practice on real estate and environmental law, assisting clients on matters including property finance, leasing, conveyancing, zoning and permitting.

Gemma represents a wide variety of commercial clients including those in the energy, utilities and real estate development industries. She routinely coordinates with municipal and state authorities on complex permitting and zoning issues. Gemma also has extensive experience working with residential and nonprofit clients on real property transactions with substantial tax implications.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someonePrint this page